This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
ELIA Artistic Research Platform Meeting Agenda
12:00 – 13:00
Registration and lunch

Aula

13:00 – 13:25
Welcome and introduction

Aula

Maria Hansen, Jørn Mortensen, Johan Frederik Hartle

13:25 – 13:35
Unislanding Artistic Research

Aula

Glenn Loughran presenting the Unislanding Artistic Research Pamphlet

13:35 – 14:45
Interactive session on ‘Togetherness’

Aula & Anatomiesaal

That the form makes the content, is an artistic insight that probably everybody in the arts would share. What does this mean for the way we meet and work together in artistic PhD groups? How and where can we best bring together the sharing and challenging? How can the making, the representation and the critique of different research practices come together in one room? What is the spectrum we have or should develop beyond the seminar room? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different settings?

Amongst the many social changes ushered in by the Covid-19 pandemic, 2020 will be remembered as the year that distance learning technologies and methodologies were normalised and massified globally. This unprecedented event ruptured educational systems, practices and discourses in ways that are still being comprehended. Importantly, we need to acknowledge that this rupture was not a result of technological innovation but rather as a radical reconfiguration of social formation. This social reconfiguration produced a need for technological experimentation, innovation and research in the arts and its educational institutions. Within this context, art educators have begun to ask critical questions about technological innovation in education, challenging the reductive discourses of technological solutionism. Reflecting critically on the role of technological innovation in educational practices the following discussion will explore the role of diversity in digital education, artistic research and the diversification of technology through artistic research practices.

Some key questions leading the discussion are:

  • How does digital education increase diversity in educational attainment?
  • How are the democratic principles of education challenged by digital education?
  • How can the experiences of digital teaching inform face to face teaching?
  • How can digital educational practices diversify technological innovation and use? 
  • What conceptual effects can we see and foresee coming out of the pandemic situation?
  • What potential could this holdWhat are the artistic research challenges and changes in the pandemic/post pandemic landscape?
  • How are institutions/artists/researchers dealing with the consequences?
  • Crisis often results in enforcing differences, structural, economic, democratic (or lack thereof) . How can the arts with its diversity of fields and environments inside and outside academia work as a community?
  • What's at stake?

During the pandemic, research has for many of us become an activity that must be undertaken from home more or less alone with Wi-Fi connection to the university and a functional residence thus temporarily being the primary conditions for artistic research. Taking inspiration from research vessels, laboratories, workshops (e.g. for constructing custom made instruments) and particle accelerators and other sites for experience, experimentation and data collection in the natural sciences, we will think about sites of artistic research. Namely the studios, workshops, circus halls, exposition venues, their alternatives, images and sounds, bodies, texts, rehearsals and all the other sites that we need to access and re-activate artistic research as a form of eco system, a materially and affectively entangled practice. We will articulate and question conditions that enable artistic research as a situated, collective and critical practice from which education can follow through particular forms of togetherness.

14:45 – 14:55
Break
14:55 – 15:55
Interactive session on ‘Togetherness’

Aula & Anatomiesaal

That the form makes the content, is an artistic insight that probably everybody in the arts would share. What does this mean for the way we meet and work together in artistic PhD groups? How and where can we best bring together the sharing and challenging? How can the making, the representation and the critique of different research practices come together in one room? What is the spectrum we have or should develop beyond the seminar room? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different settings?

Amongst the many social changes ushered in by the Covid-19 pandemic, 2020 will be remembered as the year that distance learning technologies and methodologies were normalised and massified globally. This unprecedented event ruptured educational systems, practices and discourses in ways that are still being comprehended. Importantly, we need to acknowledge that this rupture was not a result of technological innovation but rather as a radical reconfiguration of social formation. This social reconfiguration produced a need for technological experimentation, innovation and research in the arts and its educational institutions. Within this context, art educators have begun to ask critical questions about technological innovation in education, challenging the reductive discourses of technological solutionism. Reflecting critically on the role of technological innovation in educational practices the following discussion will explore the role of diversity in digital education, artistic research and the diversification of technology through educational practices.

Some key questions leading the discussion are:

  • How does digital education increase diversity in educational attainment?
  • How are the democratic principles of education challenged by digital education?
  • How can the experiences of digital teaching inform face to face teaching?
  • How can digital educational practices diversify technological innovation and use? 
  • What conceptual effects can we see and foresee coming out of the pandemic situation?
  • What potential could this holdWhat are the artistic research challenges and changes in the pandemic/post pandemic landscape?
  • How are institutions/artists/researchers dealing with the consequences?
  • Crisis often results in enforcing differences, structural, economic, democratic (or lack thereof) . How can the arts with its diversity of fields and environments inside and outside academia work as a community?
  • What's at stake?

During the pandemic, research has for many of us become an activity that must be undertaken from home more or less alone with Wi-Fi connection to the university and a functional residence thus temporarily being the primary conditions for artistic research. Taking inspiration from research vessels, laboratories, workshops (e.g. for constructing custom made instruments) and particle accelerators and other sites for experience, experimentation and data collection in the natural sciences, we will think about sites of artistic research. Namely the studios, workshops, circus halls, exposition venues, their alternatives, images and sounds, bodies, texts, rehearsals and all the other sites that we need to access and re-activate artistic research as a form of eco system, a materially and affectively entangled practice. We will articulate and question conditions that enable artistic research as a situated, collective and critical practice from which education can follow through particular forms of togetherness.

15:55 – 16:05
Break
16:05 – 16:50
Reporting on ‘Togetherness’

Aula

16:50 – 17:05
Break
17:05 – 17:50
Frascati Manual Revisions – Update

Aula

Jørn Mortensen

17:50 – 18:00
Wrap up and closing

Aula

18:00
Dinner

Canteen