ELIA Artistic Research Platform Meeting Agenda |
![]() 12:00 – 13:00
Registration and lunchAula 13:00 – 13:25
Welcome and introductionAula Maria Hansen, Jørn Mortensen, Johan Frederik Hartle 13:25 – 13:35
Unislanding Artistic ResearchAula Glenn Loughran presenting the Unislanding Artistic Research Pamphlet 13:35 – 14:45
Interactive session on ‘Togetherness’Aula & Anatomiesaal That the form makes the content, is an artistic insight that probably everybody in the arts would share. What does this mean for the way we meet and work together in artistic PhD groups? How and where can we best bring together the sharing and challenging? How can the making, the representation and the critique of different research practices come together in one room? What is the spectrum we have or should develop beyond the seminar room? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different settings? Amongst the many social changes ushered in by the Covid-19 pandemic, 2020 will be remembered as the year that distance learning technologies and methodologies were normalised and massified globally. This unprecedented event ruptured educational systems, practices and discourses in ways that are still being comprehended. Importantly, we need to acknowledge that this rupture was not a result of technological innovation but rather as a radical reconfiguration of social formation. This social reconfiguration produced a need for technological experimentation, innovation and research in the arts and its educational institutions. Within this context, art educators have begun to ask critical questions about technological innovation in education, challenging the reductive discourses of technological solutionism. Reflecting critically on the role of technological innovation in educational practices the following discussion will explore the role of diversity in digital education, artistic research and the diversification of technology through artistic research practices. Some key questions leading the discussion are:
During the pandemic, research has for many of us become an activity that must be undertaken from home more or less alone with Wi-Fi connection to the university and a functional residence thus temporarily being the primary conditions for artistic research. Taking inspiration from research vessels, laboratories, workshops (e.g. for constructing custom made instruments) and particle accelerators and other sites for experience, experimentation and data collection in the natural sciences, we will think about sites of artistic research. Namely the studios, workshops, circus halls, exposition venues, their alternatives, images and sounds, bodies, texts, rehearsals and all the other sites that we need to access and re-activate artistic research as a form of eco system, a materially and affectively entangled practice. We will articulate and question conditions that enable artistic research as a situated, collective and critical practice from which education can follow through particular forms of togetherness. 14:45 – 14:55
Break14:55 – 15:55
Interactive session on ‘Togetherness’Aula & Anatomiesaal That the form makes the content, is an artistic insight that probably everybody in the arts would share. What does this mean for the way we meet and work together in artistic PhD groups? How and where can we best bring together the sharing and challenging? How can the making, the representation and the critique of different research practices come together in one room? What is the spectrum we have or should develop beyond the seminar room? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different settings? Amongst the many social changes ushered in by the Covid-19 pandemic, 2020 will be remembered as the year that distance learning technologies and methodologies were normalised and massified globally. This unprecedented event ruptured educational systems, practices and discourses in ways that are still being comprehended. Importantly, we need to acknowledge that this rupture was not a result of technological innovation but rather as a radical reconfiguration of social formation. This social reconfiguration produced a need for technological experimentation, innovation and research in the arts and its educational institutions. Within this context, art educators have begun to ask critical questions about technological innovation in education, challenging the reductive discourses of technological solutionism. Reflecting critically on the role of technological innovation in educational practices the following discussion will explore the role of diversity in digital education, artistic research and the diversification of technology through educational practices. Some key questions leading the discussion are:
During the pandemic, research has for many of us become an activity that must be undertaken from home more or less alone with Wi-Fi connection to the university and a functional residence thus temporarily being the primary conditions for artistic research. Taking inspiration from research vessels, laboratories, workshops (e.g. for constructing custom made instruments) and particle accelerators and other sites for experience, experimentation and data collection in the natural sciences, we will think about sites of artistic research. Namely the studios, workshops, circus halls, exposition venues, their alternatives, images and sounds, bodies, texts, rehearsals and all the other sites that we need to access and re-activate artistic research as a form of eco system, a materially and affectively entangled practice. We will articulate and question conditions that enable artistic research as a situated, collective and critical practice from which education can follow through particular forms of togetherness. 15:55 – 16:05
Break16:05 – 16:50
Reporting on ‘Togetherness’Aula 16:50 – 17:05
Break17:05 – 17:50
Frascati Manual Revisions – UpdateAula Jørn Mortensen 17:50 – 18:00
Wrap up and closingAula 18:00
DinnerCanteen |